Insufficient Invoice Description Case goes in Taxpayer’s Favour

  • In the case of Fount Construction Ltd v HMRC [2024] UKFTT 340 (TC), HMRC had disallowed claims for recovery of input tax on the basis that the corresponding invoices held by the Appellant didn’t meet the legislative requirements
  • The denial amounted to three invoices from the same company with the VAT totalling £15,218.59 (“Contested Invoices”)
  • The Contested Invoices each contained a description “Building Works at the above” and the invoices contained the job address for the building site in question
  • HMRC’s decision was that the Contested Invoices didn’t meet the requirements of regulation 14 (1) paragraphs (g) and (h) of the VAT Regulation 1995;
    (g) a description sufficient to identify the goods and services supplied
    (h) for each description, the quantity of the goods or the extent of the services, and the rate of VAT and the amount payable, excluding VAT, expressed in any currency
  • The First-tier Tax Tribunal (“FTT”) found that the purpose of the description on an invoice is 1) to enable the customer and supplier to have a common understanding of which services the invoice relates to and 2) to provide HMRC with a means of understanding the essential nature of supply and a means of identifying the supply in correspondence with the customer or supplier to seek more information as needed
  • The FTT didn’t agree with HMRC that the invoice needs to be in such detail to enable HMRC to draw definitive views on the VAT treatment of the supply from the invoice alone stating “The invoice is a gateway into any enquiries by HMRC, rather than a repository to any questions that might be asked.”
  • Therefore, the FTT found the short description utilised on the Contested Invoices in this case was sufficient to meet the requirements of Regulation 14 and the appeal was allowed

See the full case here.

Comment

We have seen HMRC raise VAT assessments for the same reasons as laid out in this case i.e. an insufficient description. It is important to try to defend any such allegations and/or supply alternative evidence to HMRC to demonstrate the supply took place and the input tax denial is valid before HMRC make a decision and you incur the cost of appealing to the FTT and attending a hearing.

*Information is taken from Aspire Business Partnership

Need some advice? Our knowledgeable, friendly team are ready to pick up the phone.

Put the kettle on and give us a
call on 01245 493832

Get a Free Quote for your Construction Payroll

"*" indicates required fields

EEBS needs the contact information you provide to us to contact you about our products and services. You may unsubscribe from these communications at anytime. For information on how to unsubscribe, as well as our privacy practices and commitment to protecting your privacy, check out our Privacy Policy.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Nick Pilgrim

M.D. | CIS Payroll Expert
01245 493832

Nick loves nothing more than chewing the fat over CIS payroll queries – actually that’s not strictly true; he likes playing golf and driving round Europe, but pick up the phone to him anyway!

Who are we, anyway?

EEBS clients are covered by our cast iron guarantee, providing you with 100% HMRC compliance

Our ongoing review process to keep them one step ahead of both current and proposed legislative changes

Uniquely, our service has never been challenged by HMRC in over 20 years of operations.